I use “Black Swan” in the context of the whole book
Please don’t take terminology with fairly precise meaning and use it idiosyncratically. At best, you unnecessary increase your inferential distance. At worst, you dilute the term so that it increases everyone’s inferential distance.
Please don’t take terminology with fairly precise meaning and use it idiosyncratically. At best, you unnecessary increase your inferential distance. At worst, you dilute the term so that it increases everyone’s inferential distance.
Edited for clarity. Thought terms get diluted all the time.
Maybe “Talebian” would be more appropriate.