Good catch, thanks—Craig is not in fact a creationist.
Going back to the original question, though, I think such viewpoint-cracking is what Carroll is going for. I wouldn’t like to guess his chances of success—Craig is really good in public debating—but I do think that’s his intended effect, and that he thinks it’s worth it.
Good catch, thanks—Craig is not in fact a creationist.
Going back to the original question, though, I think such viewpoint-cracking is what Carroll is going for. I wouldn’t like to guess his chances of success—Craig is really good in public debating—but I do think that’s his intended effect, and that he thinks it’s worth it.