Ah! Edited version: “there’s no *obvious* distribution p(a,x)” (which could have been “natural distribution” or “canonical distribution”). The point is that you need more information than what should be sufficient (the effect of the action) to do evidential decision theory.
Ah! Edited version: “there’s no *obvious* distribution p(a,x)” (which could have been “natural distribution” or “canonical distribution”). The point is that you need more information than what should be sufficient (the effect of the action) to do evidential decision theory.