This seems to be speaking in a different world than the main post. “stopping feedback” seems to my mind to suggest to be ambivalent amongst outcomes when the post is about how distinctions remain even if stuckness is abolished.
The bit in the comment about negative feedback loop, I understood as the person has an expectation how things are going to go and the frequent/central outcome is that something different or short of that happens and this makes for negative feedback. The feedforward setup is then that in a given state one can favour some actions over others (say jump if see red and run if see blue) but there is no success or failure because the result isn’t even looked at.
This seems to be speaking in a different world than the main post. “stopping feedback” seems to my mind to suggest to be ambivalent amongst outcomes when the post is about how distinctions remain even if stuckness is abolished.
The bit in the comment about negative feedback loop, I understood as the person has an expectation how things are going to go and the frequent/central outcome is that something different or short of that happens and this makes for negative feedback. The feedforward setup is then that in a given state one can favour some actions over others (say jump if see red and run if see blue) but there is no success or failure because the result isn’t even looked at.