You’re assuming I agree with the premise. I don’t. I don’t think that bombing GPU clusters in other countries will help much to advance AI safety, so I don’t think the conclusion follows from the premise.
I agree with the principle that if X is overwhelmingly important and Y achieves X, then we should do Y, but the weak point of the argument is that Y achieves X. I do not think it does. You should respond to the argument that I’m actually saying.
You’re assuming I agree with the premise. I don’t. I don’t think that bombing GPU clusters in other countries will help much to advance AI safety, so I don’t think the conclusion follows from the premise.
I agree with the principle that if X is overwhelmingly important and Y achieves X, then we should do Y, but the weak point of the argument is that Y achieves X. I do not think it does. You should respond to the argument that I’m actually saying.