But yeah, “diyer” is too close to “die” to be easily distinguishable. Maybe “rubemond”?
I could see the argument for that, provided we also had saphmonds, emmonds etc… Otherwise you run the risk of claiming a special connection that doesn’t exist.
We would also need to find a different word for almonds.
I could see the argument for that, provided we also had saphmonds, emmonds etc… Otherwise you run the risk of claiming a special connection that doesn’t exist.
We would also need to find a different word for almonds.