So I may as well discount all probability lines in which the evidence I’m seeing isn’t a valid representation of an underlying reality.
But that would destroy your ability to deal with optical illusions and misdirection.
Perhaps I should say …in which I can’t reasonably expect to GET evidence entangled with an underlying reality.
But that would destroy your ability to deal with optical illusions and misdirection.
Perhaps I should say …in which I can’t reasonably expect to GET evidence entangled with an underlying reality.