my initial guess is that your methodology would still be superficial pattern-matching, but it would just be a deeper, more complex level of it.
Fair enough. If I accept that guess as true, I agree with your conclusion.
I also agree that adopting the enemy’s perspective is an important—for humans, indispensible—part of strategic thinking.
Fair enough. If I accept that guess as true, I agree with your conclusion.
I also agree that adopting the enemy’s perspective is an important—for humans, indispensible—part of strategic thinking.