Strong AI is refuted because syntax is insufficient for semantics.
A wild Aristotelian Teleologist appears!
Phrasing claims in the passive voice to lend an air of authority is grating to the educated ear.
Aside from stylistic concerns, though, I believe you’re claiming that electronic circuits don’t really mean anything. However, I’m not sure whether you’re making the testable claim that no arrangement of electronic circuits will ever perform complicated cross-domain optimization better than a human, or the untestable claim that no electronic circuit will ever really be able to think.
A wild Aristotelian Teleologist appears!
Phrasing claims in the passive voice to lend an air of authority is grating to the educated ear.
Aside from stylistic concerns, though, I believe you’re claiming that electronic circuits don’t really mean anything. However, I’m not sure whether you’re making the testable claim that no arrangement of electronic circuits will ever perform complicated cross-domain optimization better than a human, or the untestable claim that no electronic circuit will ever really be able to think.