Hmm. My intuition is that Flow is no more or less than intimate familiarity with a repertoire of tasks/procedures/heuristics used to reliably solve scoped problems. Do you think Flow could be applied to, e.g., piano performance? What about debugging programs? “Flow” as used in wider culture could certainly be applied that way.
The difficulty of communicating/teaching many procedures and heuristics is the problem with trying to taskify dating advice, IMO.
I agree—“flow” happens to masters who have taskified the process and practiced it so many times that it becomes procedural rather than declarative knowledge.
Hmm. My intuition is that Flow is no more or less than intimate familiarity with a repertoire of tasks/procedures/heuristics used to reliably solve scoped problems. Do you think Flow could be applied to, e.g., piano performance? What about debugging programs? “Flow” as used in wider culture could certainly be applied that way.
The difficulty of communicating/teaching many procedures and heuristics is the problem with trying to taskify dating advice, IMO.
I agree—“flow” happens to masters who have taskified the process and practiced it so many times that it becomes procedural rather than declarative knowledge.
Yes. This can definitely be done with sex/romance, but it seems that many people want everything to work perfectly the first time… Sorry folks.
I’ve experienced the state called “flow” when playing the piano, so consider this a big. fat, YES.
You are talking about the same thing I’m talking about, right?