Yeah, that person clearly has too much of his identity tied up in this stuff. His post reads like an atheist who has been consigned to debate creationists for all his days.
The paper’s authors found that X is false, and Motl contends that in fact X is obviously false so the authors are bad people for even talking about it.
It’s as though the paper proved that if the moon were made of cheese then it could not be green, and Motl took them to task for being pro- “the moon is made out of cheese”.
Yeah, that person clearly has too much of his identity tied up in this stuff. His post reads like an atheist who has been consigned to debate creationists for all his days.
The paper’s authors found that X is false, and Motl contends that in fact X is obviously false so the authors are bad people for even talking about it.
It’s as though the paper proved that if the moon were made of cheese then it could not be green, and Motl took them to task for being pro- “the moon is made out of cheese”.