But isn’t it strange that there are so many questions for which the evidence we have is so very balanced?
But there aren’t. We just focus on the very tiny subset of questions for which that is the case, because those are the ones that are interesting.
Relevant post from Robin Hanson.
If the evidence is overwhelmingly for or, we call that a fact or a falsehood, not a question.
But there aren’t. We just focus on the very tiny subset of questions for which that is the case, because those are the ones that are interesting.
Relevant post from Robin Hanson.
If the evidence is overwhelmingly for or, we call that a fact or a falsehood, not a question.