How so? Eliezer’s thesis is “AGI is dangerous and FAI is possible”. If he’s wrong—if AGI poses no danger or FAI is impossible—then what do you need a Frodo for?
Edited the grandparent to disambiguate the context.
(I haven’t discussed that particular thesis of Eliezer’s and nor does doubting that particular belief seem to be a take home message from multi’s post. The great grandparent is just a straightforward answer to the paragraph it quotes.)
Which, of course, would still leave the second two dot points as answers to your question.
How so? Eliezer’s thesis is “AGI is dangerous and FAI is possible”. If he’s wrong—if AGI poses no danger or FAI is impossible—then what do you need a Frodo for?
Edited the grandparent to disambiguate the context.
(I haven’t discussed that particular thesis of Eliezer’s and nor does doubting that particular belief seem to be a take home message from multi’s post. The great grandparent is just a straightforward answer to the paragraph it quotes.)