I want my old model of Eliezer Yudkowsky back!
Eliezer Yudkowsky is the supreme being to whom it is up to all of us to become superior!
I want my old model of Eliezer Yudkowsky back! Eliezer Yudkowsky is the supreme being to whom it is up to all of us to become superior!
I think chaosmosis would prefer to perceive this as occurring through a change in chaosmosis than a change in chaosmosis’s evidence about Eliezer.
No preference.
I don’t understand how your comment is responsive to atorm’s though, so I might be missing something here.
It responds to the disconnect between the quote and the quoted quote, in particular the implication of the latter regarding the former.
Eliezer Yudkowsky is the supreme being to whom it is up to all of us to become superior!
I think chaosmosis would prefer to perceive this as occurring through a change in chaosmosis than a change in chaosmosis’s evidence about Eliezer.
No preference.
I don’t understand how your comment is responsive to atorm’s though, so I might be missing something here.
It responds to the disconnect between the quote and the quoted quote, in particular the implication of the latter regarding the former.