If project A is what you’ve always done in the past, even with the knowledge that project B is superior, you can induce that you will probably continue with project A.
Probably, but shouldn’t? If project B is superior, is that not the superior choice?
I think I understand the point you are making, I just want to be clear that there is a distinction between what is supposed to happen and what is likely to happen.
To put it another way, the prognosis of recovering irrationalists is, so far, not good.
As I read it, this was the main point of the original post. Most of us (I suspect) still get rather different answers when we honestly ask “what action should I take” and “what action would I take”.
Probably, but shouldn’t? If project B is superior, is that not the superior choice?
I think I understand the point you are making, I just want to be clear that there is a distinction between what is supposed to happen and what is likely to happen.
Yes.
To put it another way, the prognosis of recovering irrationalists is, so far, not good.
As I read it, this was the main point of the original post. Most of us (I suspect) still get rather different answers when we honestly ask “what action should I take” and “what action would I take”.