Remember that if Tom Riddle dies, a potentially vengeful demon with significant magical power is unleashed. Preventing that from happening is worth doing for the sake of those common people, regardless of its impact on Tom Riddle.
Yeah, and that make sense. There’s also that he may be one of the last remaining repositories for lost knowledge.
But we’ve seen internal monologue from Harry where he thinks about the intrinsic value of Voldemort’s life and the values of the children’s children’s children and so on. It’s incredibly naive. Voldemort is an immortal psychopath who is ridiculously overpowered and very difficult to contain. Taking that guy out is entirely in sync with valuing life in general. I’m not a fan of the death penalty, but his mere existence is threatening enough that I would make an exception with no hesitation and not feel bad about it ever.
Taking that guy out is entirely in sync with valuing life in general. I’m not a fan of the death penalty, but his mere existence is threatening enough that I would make an exception with no hesitation and not feel bad about it ever.
Harry has taken him out, in the most effective way possible. The existence of the Horcrux network means that the death penalty is not an effective punishment or removal method.
No, but moderating the memory charm is foolishness. He isn’t even remotely proficient with that charm. He should either have gotten expert help, or gone for a total wipe.
No, but moderating the memory charm is foolishness.
I think I would have just transfigured him into the jewel without doing the memory charm until much later, but on reflection I think that given Harry’s uncertainty about how V’s mind transfer system works, doing a substandard memory charm now is better than not doing one at all.
The point was that it’s possible. Why might it actually occur? First, he might figure ‘I did this, so I’m going to fix it’. Also, they are fairly powerful, comparatively speaking, to common people—he might have some plot to raise them and bind them to help him or put them in a position that he expects a net positive in his future effectiveness?
Why would Harry resurrect Death Eaters and not common people, who are dying in millions all over the world?
Why is he spending effort on saving Tom Riddle and not common people, who are dying in millions all over the world?
Remember that if Tom Riddle dies, a potentially vengeful demon with significant magical power is unleashed. Preventing that from happening is worth doing for the sake of those common people, regardless of its impact on Tom Riddle.
Yeah, and that make sense. There’s also that he may be one of the last remaining repositories for lost knowledge.
But we’ve seen internal monologue from Harry where he thinks about the intrinsic value of Voldemort’s life and the values of the children’s children’s children and so on. It’s incredibly naive. Voldemort is an immortal psychopath who is ridiculously overpowered and very difficult to contain. Taking that guy out is entirely in sync with valuing life in general. I’m not a fan of the death penalty, but his mere existence is threatening enough that I would make an exception with no hesitation and not feel bad about it ever.
I didn’t like it either, but:
Harry has taken him out, in the most effective way possible. The existence of the Horcrux network means that the death penalty is not an effective punishment or removal method.
No, but moderating the memory charm is foolishness. He isn’t even remotely proficient with that charm. He should either have gotten expert help, or gone for a total wipe.
I think I would have just transfigured him into the jewel without doing the memory charm until much later, but on reflection I think that given Harry’s uncertainty about how V’s mind transfer system works, doing a substandard memory charm now is better than not doing one at all.
He is not saving Tom Riddle. He is saving millions by keeping Tom Riddle alive.
The point was that it’s possible. Why might it actually occur? First, he might figure ‘I did this, so I’m going to fix it’. Also, they are fairly powerful, comparatively speaking, to common people—he might have some plot to raise them and bind them to help him or put them in a position that he expects a net positive in his future effectiveness?