Your way of handling macroscopic ontologies entails knightian uncertainty over the microscopic possibilities.
Nothing can deal with quark-level pictures, so it’s the only option.
EG, if humans reasoned this way using intuitive physics, we’d be afraid that any science experiment creating weird conditions might destroy the world
Using intuitive physics, there aren’t any microscopic conditions. Its a recent discovery that macroscopic objects are made of invisibly tiny components. So there was a time when people didn’t worry that moving one electron would destroy the universe because they had not heard of electrons, followed by a time when people knew that moving one electron would not destroy the universe because they understood electrons. Where’s the problem?
Nothing can deal with quark-level pictures, so it’s the only option.
Using intuitive physics, there aren’t any microscopic conditions. Its a recent discovery that macroscopic objects are made of invisibly tiny components. So there was a time when people didn’t worry that moving one electron would destroy the universe because they had not heard of electrons, followed by a time when people knew that moving one electron would not destroy the universe because they understood electrons. Where’s the problem?