Considering that the book is from 1998, is there anything in the book that you know to have been falsified or obsolete? Does it still represent an accurate understanding of today’s knowledge?
That’s a good question. Unfortunately, most of my knowledge of the field comes from this book, so I don’t know. (If anyone does have better information, feel free to chime in.)
Considering that the book is from 1998, is there anything in the book that you know to have been falsified or obsolete? Does it still represent an accurate understanding of today’s knowledge?
That’s a good question. Unfortunately, most of my knowledge of the field comes from this book, so I don’t know. (If anyone does have better information, feel free to chime in.)