Thanks. Could you be more specific about what strikes you as not as rational as you’d like to see?
Note that “the article” as you see it now is not the one that VoiceOfRa deleted twice.
That’s fine. I still want to know what VoR was objecting to.
Understood, of course. I just wanted to forestall some possible confusion.
Thanks. Could you be more specific about what strikes you as not as rational as you’d like to see?
Note that “the article” as you see it now is not the one that VoiceOfRa deleted twice.
That’s fine. I still want to know what VoR was objecting to.
Understood, of course. I just wanted to forestall some possible confusion.