I’m curious as to how accurate your self-estimate of your discount rate is. Are you heavily in debt or otherwise deeply leveraged? You should be able to find all kinds of opportunities to borrow at less than 15% interest.
I appreciate you said that, because I realized that despite my claim of a high discount rate, I haven’t actually borrowed any money. Probably if I had a steady stream of income I would.
I really did mean (3), and I’m not ashamed of it. My thinking is that if you’re an individual who’s trying to be as effective as possible, you’re going to want to guess what you can do to be maximally effective right now, and I might as well fit my formulas for you.
Edit: It’s true that there is higher variance in a person’s output over a short time period. But I’m not sure we should avoid a question just because it’s hard to answer.
Probably if I had a steady stream of income I would.
Makes sense. Just because you have a high discount rate doesn’t mean you have a high tolerance for risk; there’s a fine line between wanting to redirect your future income toward the present and wanting to spend now at the cost of going bankrupt later
.>I really did mean (3), and I’m not ashamed of it.
Well, at least that clears up your motives—they’re pure. Sorry I doubted you. I thought maybe for a moment that you just liked showing off calculus, but I guess you were just trying to attack a really hard problem. This comment is sincere, not sarcastic.
But I’m not sure we should avoid a question just because it’s hard to answer.
Avoid, no. Save for slightly later, yes. In my opinion, the much easier and nearly as useful problem of calculating medium-term net present value should have been solved first, and then once we all understand that and have begun to apply it to our everyday lives, then it’s time to try to solve the much harder and only marginally more useful problem of calculating instantaneous net present value. But, you know, you’re the one doing the work, and (not knowing you) I have no reason to distrust your estimate of your ability to solve a really hard problem. So, good luck!
I appreciate you said that, because I realized that despite my claim of a high discount rate, I haven’t actually borrowed any money. Probably if I had a steady stream of income I would.
I really did mean (3), and I’m not ashamed of it. My thinking is that if you’re an individual who’s trying to be as effective as possible, you’re going to want to guess what you can do to be maximally effective right now, and I might as well fit my formulas for you.
Edit: It’s true that there is higher variance in a person’s output over a short time period. But I’m not sure we should avoid a question just because it’s hard to answer.
Makes sense. Just because you have a high discount rate doesn’t mean you have a high tolerance for risk; there’s a fine line between wanting to redirect your future income toward the present and wanting to spend now at the cost of going bankrupt later
.>I really did mean (3), and I’m not ashamed of it.
Well, at least that clears up your motives—they’re pure. Sorry I doubted you. I thought maybe for a moment that you just liked showing off calculus, but I guess you were just trying to attack a really hard problem. This comment is sincere, not sarcastic.
Avoid, no. Save for slightly later, yes. In my opinion, the much easier and nearly as useful problem of calculating medium-term net present value should have been solved first, and then once we all understand that and have begun to apply it to our everyday lives, then it’s time to try to solve the much harder and only marginally more useful problem of calculating instantaneous net present value. But, you know, you’re the one doing the work, and (not knowing you) I have no reason to distrust your estimate of your ability to solve a really hard problem. So, good luck!