One of the key pieces to this that I find is surprisingly nonobvious to a lot of people is the difference between concluding that event E is evidence for belief B on the one hand, and concluding that if I perceive E then B must be true on the other.
Good point, will keep in mind.
I once told my Dad that his car accident was only proof of God because he was looking to find evidence to support God, when really it was just medical science and his own body’s repair mechanisms that saved him.
Good point, will keep in mind.
I once told my Dad that his car accident was only proof of God because he was looking to find evidence to support God, when really it was just medical science and his own body’s repair mechanisms that saved him.
It had no effect.