Note that these first show up in the section on signaling.
Later on, there’s a criticism of Deontology (using Rules as the final arbiter of what’s right), by appealing to Rules:
There are only two possible justifications for the deontologist’s action. First, [th]ey might feel that rules like “don’t murder” are vast overarching moral laws that are much more important than simple empirical facts like whether people live or die. But this violates the Morality Lives In The World principle
Note that these first show up in the section on signaling.
Later on, there’s a criticism of Deontology (using Rules as the final arbiter of what’s right), by appealing to Rules:
Still later on:
Hmm.