Why is giving money to x-risk charities conducive to saving the world?
I think the reasoning goes something like:
Existential risks are things that could destroy the world as we know it.
Existential risk charities work to reduce such risks.
Existential risk charities use donations to perform said task
Giving to x-risk charities is conducive to saving the world.
Before looking at evidence for or against the effectiveness of particular x-risk charities our prior expectation should be that people who dedicate themselves to doing something are more likely to contribute progress towards that goal than to sabotage it.
I think the reasoning goes something like:
Existential risks are things that could destroy the world as we know it.
Existential risk charities work to reduce such risks.
Existential risk charities use donations to perform said task
Giving to x-risk charities is conducive to saving the world.
Before looking at evidence for or against the effectiveness of particular x-risk charities our prior expectation should be that people who dedicate themselves to doing something are more likely to contribute progress towards that goal than to sabotage it.