On the hypothesis that the subject becomes angry, and wants to hurt the other person, we might predict that the subject will > take any of many possible avenues to revenge—a kick, a trip, a bite, a phone call two months later that leads the
confederate’s wife and girlfriend to the same hotel… All of these I can predict by saying, “The subject is angry, and wants
revenge.”
Is it not fake causality to show a variety of different outcomes, all for the exact same reason?
Or perhaps is the point that saying ‘angry’ increases the probability of certain responses to other?
Is it not fake causality to show a variety of different outcomes, all for the exact same reason?
Or perhaps is the point that saying ‘angry’ increases the probability of certain responses to other?