If you accept funding to do something to help the world, you’re not helping the world unless you’re underpaid, and the degree you’re helping the world is proportional to the degree you’re underpaid.
OR, you manage to secure funding from people or sources that would otherwise have been wasted or used inefficiently.
I don’t understand. Surely someone who volunteers as a grant-getter is being more benevolent than someone who accepts a wage to work as a grant-getter. Unpaid volunteering is exactly analogous to accepting a wage and then turning around and donating it, which is surely praiseworthy.
I don’t disagree with either of those statements, or your overall position. Indeed, I’m actually taking your suggested approach myself. I would go as far as to say that any direct participation that I have in research in my chosen field is less benevolent than a pure focus on wealth creation (and harvesting).
I should have included disclaimers to that effect when exploring, as I was, a technical curiosity.
OR, you manage to secure funding from people or sources that would otherwise have been wasted or used inefficiently.
I don’t understand. Surely someone who volunteers as a grant-getter is being more benevolent than someone who accepts a wage to work as a grant-getter. Unpaid volunteering is exactly analogous to accepting a wage and then turning around and donating it, which is surely praiseworthy.
I don’t disagree with either of those statements, or your overall position. Indeed, I’m actually taking your suggested approach myself. I would go as far as to say that any direct participation that I have in research in my chosen field is less benevolent than a pure focus on wealth creation (and harvesting).
I should have included disclaimers to that effect when exploring, as I was, a technical curiosity.