1- a physicist who promotes his own views in books, and blaming the unpopularity of his view on the amount of crackpots in physics
2- someone who gives a clearly false image of the reception of a theory
3 - someone who hasn’t got a proper education on physics, calling the majority of physics crackpots
4- someone who thinks ‘science’ itself isn’t the best method for science
5- someone who postulates very big ideas, and says he doesn’t need observations to prove it
6 - someone referring to ‘in the future’ we may have these observations, as a proof
a new crackpot-index!:
1- a physicist who promotes his own views in books, and blaming the unpopularity of his view on the amount of crackpots in physics 2- someone who gives a clearly false image of the reception of a theory 3 - someone who hasn’t got a proper education on physics, calling the majority of physics crackpots 4- someone who thinks ‘science’ itself isn’t the best method for science 5- someone who postulates very big ideas, and says he doesn’t need observations to prove it 6 - someone referring to ‘in the future’ we may have these observations, as a proof