The way you move directly to addressing objections without fleshing out a strong prima facie case for thinking that AI support > poverty reduction weakens your argument, particularly for a reader who isn’t already familiar with the concepts. In other words, the reader probably won’t have the objections you’re refuting, because you haven’t really made an argument that one could object to.
The way you move directly to addressing objections without fleshing out a strong prima facie case for thinking that AI support > poverty reduction weakens your argument, particularly for a reader who isn’t already familiar with the concepts. In other words, the reader probably won’t have the objections you’re refuting, because you haven’t really made an argument that one could object to.