Seconding this comment; I will just further add that
You repeated some failed experiments in the hope of getting a different result.
Is known as ‘repeatability’, and is normally considered virtuous to do.
It’s usually more ‘virtuous’ to replicate the positive (i.e. information-laden, surprising) results, while repeating negative results seems more like fishing for better p-values.
Seconding this comment; I will just further add that
Is known as ‘repeatability’, and is normally considered virtuous to do.
It’s usually more ‘virtuous’ to replicate the positive (i.e. information-laden, surprising) results, while repeating negative results seems more like fishing for better p-values.