“Quantum dice” is just a short-hand for “truly random decision making method”, and a quantum multiverse is for decision-theoretical purposes equivalent to [...]
Unfortunately, some people take it overly seriously, just look at the recent posts about infinities and death in many worlds, and about whether a copy of you preserves your identity. Some are filled with quantum angst.
If, as ShardPhoenix says, “quantum multiverse is for decision-theoretical purposes equivalent to having an infinite ensemble of classical universes with small differences between them, plus self-location uncertainty”, (BTW I would use “similar” instead of “equivalent”), “posts about infinities and death in many worlds, and about whether a copy of you preserves your identity” seem perfectly justified, so I find your comment puzzling as a response to his comment.
Unfortunately, some people take it overly seriously, just look at the recent posts about infinities and death in many worlds, and about whether a copy of you preserves your identity. Some are filled with quantum angst.
If, as ShardPhoenix says, “quantum multiverse is for decision-theoretical purposes equivalent to having an infinite ensemble of classical universes with small differences between them, plus self-location uncertainty”, (BTW I would use “similar” instead of “equivalent”), “posts about infinities and death in many worlds, and about whether a copy of you preserves your identity” seem perfectly justified, so I find your comment puzzling as a response to his comment.
Is there reason not to take it seriously, from a quantum-mechanical perspective?
I may not agree with their conclusions, but I’m fairly sure the MWI worlds actually exist.