Human behavior is much more complex that ice spreading over a lake. So it’s actually simplifying the situation to think in terms of “agents that have goals – what do I predict they want?”, in a way that it wouldn’t be for ice.
Every behavior is complex when you look into the details. But the general patterns are often quite simple. And humans are no exception. They expand and take over, easy to predict. Sometimes the expansion stalls for a time, but then resumes. What do you think is so different in overall human patterns from the natural phenomena?
Not sure what you are asking and how it is relevant to the general patterns that could trigger an adverse AI response. Also, how much of your stance is triggered by the “humans are special” belief?
Human behavior is much more complex that ice spreading over a lake. So it’s actually simplifying the situation to think in terms of “agents that have goals – what do I predict they want?”, in a way that it wouldn’t be for ice.
Every behavior is complex when you look into the details. But the general patterns are often quite simple. And humans are no exception. They expand and take over, easy to predict. Sometimes the expansion stalls for a time, but then resumes. What do you think is so different in overall human patterns from the natural phenomena?
If that’s true, why do you think humans have theory of mind?
Not sure what you are asking and how it is relevant to the general patterns that could trigger an adverse AI response. Also, how much of your stance is triggered by the “humans are special” belief?
Ah, yeah I just re-read the opening thread and then re-read your comment think I just agree.