What a terrible paper altogether. This was a peer-reviewed journal, right?
Some things even peer-review can’t cure. I looked through a few of their back-issues and was far from impressed. On the other hand, this ranking puts them above Topoi, Nous, and Ethics. I’m not even sure what that means—maybe their scale is broken?
Some things even peer-review can’t cure. I looked through a few of their back-issues and was far from impressed. On the other hand, this ranking puts them above Topoi, Nous, and Ethics. I’m not even sure what that means—maybe their scale is broken?
Maybe there’s some confounding factor—like sudden recent interest in Singularity/transhumanist topics forcing the cite count up?
Unlikely, they have been highly ranked for a long time and singularity/transhumanist topics are only a very small part of what JCS covers.