This passage by Grothendieck (source) seems potentially relevant:
What my experience of mathematical work has taught me again
and again, is that the proof always springs from the insight, and not the
other way round – and that the insight itself has its source, first and fore-
most, in a delicate and obstinate feeling of the relevant entities and concepts
and their mutual relations. The guiding thread is the inner coherence of the
image which gradually emerges from the mist, as well as its consonance with
what is known or foreshadowed from other sources – and it guides all the
more surely as the “exigence” of coherence is stronger and more delicate.
This passage by Grothendieck (source) seems potentially relevant: