Vladimir_Nesov comments on Arguments for optimism on AI Alignment (I don’t endorse this version, will reupload a new version soon.)

[Vladimir_Nesov]

Reversing biases of public perception isn’t much use for sorting out correctness of arguments.

It’s not just public perception, but also the very researchers are biased to believe that danger is or will happen.

The researchers are not the arguments. You are discussing correctness of researchers.

[Noosphere89]

The researchers are not the arguments.

Yes, that’s true, but I have more evidence than that, and in particular I have evidence that directly argues against the proposition of AI doom, and that a lot of common arguments for AI doom.

The researchers aren’t the arguments, but the properties of the researchers looking into the arguments, especially the way they’re biased, does provide some evidence for certain proposition.