Surely you can see how this does not at all imply that I object to intuition, yes? Logically, after all, there are at least three other possibilities:
That I don’t believe that intuitions can be taught; or…
That I don’t believe that this particular approach (circling) is good for teaching intuitions; or…
That I object to circling for reasons unrelated to the (purported) fact that it teaches intuitions.
(There are other, subtler, possibilities; but these three are the obvious ones.)
The conclusion that I have something against intuitions, drawn from the observation that I am skeptical of circling in particular (or any similar thing), seems to me to be really quite unwarranted.
Yes. If you’re wondering, I basically updated more towards #1.
I wouldn’t call the conclusion unwarranted by the way, it’s a perfectly valid interpretation of seeing this sort of stance from you, it was simply uninformed.
Surely you can see how this does not at all imply that I object to intuition, yes? Logically, after all, there are at least three other possibilities:
That I don’t believe that intuitions can be taught; or…
That I don’t believe that this particular approach (circling) is good for teaching intuitions; or…
That I object to circling for reasons unrelated to the (purported) fact that it teaches intuitions.
(There are other, subtler, possibilities; but these three are the obvious ones.)
The conclusion that I have something against intuitions, drawn from the observation that I am skeptical of circling in particular (or any similar thing), seems to me to be really quite unwarranted.
Yes. If you’re wondering, I basically updated more towards #1.
I wouldn’t call the conclusion unwarranted by the way, it’s a perfectly valid interpretation of seeing this sort of stance from you, it was simply uninformed.