Non-running algorithms have no experiences, so the latter is not a possible outcome. I think this is perhaps an unspoken axiom here.
No disagreement here—that’s what I meant by oblivion.
OK, cool, but now I’m confused. If we’re meaning the same thing, I don’t understand how it can be a question—“not running” isn’t a thing an algorithm can experience; it’s a logical impossibility.
No disagreement here—that’s what I meant by oblivion.
OK, cool, but now I’m confused. If we’re meaning the same thing, I don’t understand how it can be a question—“not running” isn’t a thing an algorithm can experience; it’s a logical impossibility.