Adding to your first point: Or they don’t make arguments simply because—even if strong and in the absence of social costs—it does not pay.
(I think of the example of some policy debates where I know tons of academics who could easily provide tons of very strong, rather obvious arguments, that are essentially not made because none seems to care getting involved)
Adding to your first point: Or they don’t make arguments simply because—even if strong and in the absence of social costs—it does not pay.
(I think of the example of some policy debates where I know tons of academics who could easily provide tons of very strong, rather obvious arguments, that are essentially not made because none seems to care getting involved)