Took every quote posted in this thread so far and Markov-ised it. (Depth of 1, i.e., each word only depends on the word before it. A depth of 2 basically regurgitates the input in this case.)
Here are some of the results:
“How do you regenerate that beat Reedspacer’s Lower Bound?”
“It’s a more karma. I interpreted your map, not a group you feel prejudiced against, frequentists for infanticide.”
“Look, just generalize from halo effect.”
“Okay, but in this is rational under them to make six figures as a cult.”
“Beliefs are just an inferential distance and my belief is the territory.”
“That’s just a survey should do you measure, not throw all the scientific knowledge a dissolved question.”
“Any organization with the teacher’s password.”
“That’s just rejecting religion and closely guarded secret, so it but there’s no idea how BIG thingspace is.”
“Foo is the karma system more likely.”
“You make six figures as a thousand shards of inferential distance and I cooperate.”
“Conceptspace is white.”
“Go ahead and only if and it’s objective, but I think he’s just what the Nazis did!”
“There’s a Philosophy professor about definitions.”
“I might write rationalist fanfiction of the other person will cooperate if snow is no context.”
“Mysteriousness is true rejection?”
“I’d say politically incorrect about it before proposing solutions?”
“Arguments are you feel prejudiced against, frequentists for infanticide.”
“I have to suppress dissent.”
“Of course I wanna be the universe with rationality?”
“Money is an argument about my belief that one of a rationalist.”
“I pattern matched what you know the Society for link me to a startup, I think of any more elaborate.”
Took every quote posted in this thread so far and Markov-ised it. (Depth of 1, i.e., each word only depends on the word before it. A depth of 2 basically regurgitates the input in this case.)
Here are some of the results:
“How do you regenerate that beat Reedspacer’s Lower Bound?”
“It’s a more karma. I interpreted your map, not a group you feel prejudiced against, frequentists for infanticide.”
“Look, just generalize from halo effect.”
“Okay, but in this is rational under them to make six figures as a cult.”
“Beliefs are just an inferential distance and my belief is the territory.”
“That’s just a survey should do you measure, not throw all the scientific knowledge a dissolved question.”
“Any organization with the teacher’s password.”
“That’s just rejecting religion and closely guarded secret, so it but there’s no idea how BIG thingspace is.”
“Foo is the karma system more likely.”
“You make six figures as a thousand shards of inferential distance and I cooperate.”
“Conceptspace is white.”
“Go ahead and only if and it’s objective, but I think he’s just what the Nazis did!”
“There’s a Philosophy professor about definitions.”
“I might write rationalist fanfiction of the other person will cooperate if snow is no context.”
“Mysteriousness is true rejection?”
“I’d say politically incorrect about it before proposing solutions?”
“Arguments are you feel prejudiced against, frequentists for infanticide.”
“I have to suppress dissent.”
“Of course I wanna be the universe with rationality?”
“Money is an argument about my belief that one of a rationalist.”
“I pattern matched what you know the Society for link me to a startup, I think of any more elaborate.”
“‘Snow is being used to say ‘purpose’.”
Frequentists for infanticide! (I hope nobody takes this seriously. I mean, ew. Who’d support such horrible statistics?)
Most of those quotes aren’t even in the post anymore. :(
(Cut it down drastically because the wall of text was too high.)
Awesome.