see also the lengthy discussionsin Garfinkel and Dafoe (2019) and Kroll et al. (2016), discussed in Section 1 Footnote 1
Should that say “Section 2 footnote 3”, or “Section 1 & 2 footnote 3″, or something like that? And should that be Garfinkel (2018), rather than Garfinkel and Dafoe (2019)?
Interesting post!
Should that say “Section 2 footnote 3”, or “Section 1 & 2 footnote 3″, or something like that? And should that be Garfinkel (2018), rather than Garfinkel and Dafoe (2019)?
Yep, fixed, thanks :)