This isn’t directly responsive to the question in the post (to which I agree activity approaching light jogging should probably be modeled as higher risk than silence, though I can’t figure out how much).
But you may be interested in the following Facebook group, where Dorry Segev, a COVID researcher and organizer in the Baltimore dance scene, gives updates on best practices in holding dance events to manage risk levels https://www.facebook.com/groups/158671312715141/?ref=share
(It may be worth asking your question there as well!)
This isn’t directly responsive to the question in the post (to which I agree activity approaching light jogging should probably be modeled as higher risk than silence, though I can’t figure out how much).
Using microcovids, I evaluate any dancing related scenario as “talking volume: loud”, which they assign a x5 risk increase to.
This isn’t directly responsive to the question in the post (to which I agree activity approaching light jogging should probably be modeled as higher risk than silence, though I can’t figure out how much).
But you may be interested in the following Facebook group, where Dorry Segev, a COVID researcher and organizer in the Baltimore dance scene, gives updates on best practices in holding dance events to manage risk levels https://www.facebook.com/groups/158671312715141/?ref=share
(It may be worth asking your question there as well!)
I’ve updated the post to switch from “silent” to “normal”
Using microcovids, I evaluate any dancing related scenario as “talking volume: loud”, which they assign a x5 risk increase to.
Can you elaborate on why you see “loud” as the appropriate level? That makes a significant difference in terms of risk level.