Can I request tabooing the phrase “genuine safety role” in favor of more detailed description of the work that’s done?
I suspect that would provide some value, but did you mean to respond to @Elizabeth?
I was just trying to use the term as a synonym for “actual safety role” as @Elizabeth used it in her original comment.
There’s broad disagreement about which kinds of research are (or should count as) “AI safety”, and what’s required for that to succeed.
This part of your comment seems accurate to me, but I’m not a domain expert.
I suspect that would provide some value, but did you mean to respond to @Elizabeth?
I was just trying to use the term as a synonym for “actual safety role” as @Elizabeth used it in her original comment.
This part of your comment seems accurate to me, but I’m not a domain expert.