I think this isn’t well-enough-understood to have a set of standardized terms yet. The implied request is to try to model these things in the world yourself, and start trying to talk about them, so that *eventually* the discourse self-corrects into a crisp model that doesn’t imply absurdities like the “worlds” framework, and we can start naming things definitively. I don’t expect this to happen in public.
Which makes sense. But since it’s been brought up repeatedly as part of ongoing conversations, it seems worth making some kind of intermediate progress on helping people to grok the concept.
I realize that elsethread you mentioned:
Which makes sense. But since it’s been brought up repeatedly as part of ongoing conversations, it seems worth making some kind of intermediate progress on helping people to grok the concept.