To be fair to yourself, would you reject it if it were a proof of something you agreed with?
If they had gone out and ‘proven’ mathematically that sentient robots ARE possible, I’d be equally skeptical—not of the conclusion, but of the validity of the proof, because the core of the question is not mathematical in nature.
To be fair to yourself, would you reject it if it were a proof of something you agreed with?
If they had gone out and ‘proven’ mathematically that sentient robots ARE possible, I’d be equally skeptical—not of the conclusion, but of the validity of the proof, because the core of the question is not mathematical in nature.