one where researchers follow a more or less standardized procedure. I take it that this is already done to some extent.
I don’t see why this is good. For example, crossing the 5% “statistical significance” threshold is a more or less standard requirement to get published. That’s not something desirable.
And, of course, there is the overall objection that science is about finding out new stuff and that new stuff does not always fit well (or at all) into the usual/established/standard ways of doing things.
I don’t see why this is good. For example, crossing the 5% “statistical significance” threshold is a more or less standard requirement to get published. That’s not something desirable.
And, of course, there is the overall objection that science is about finding out new stuff and that new stuff does not always fit well (or at all) into the usual/established/standard ways of doing things.