(I suspect that if SI found the right way to communicate their core message, they could persuade average people that AI research is dangerous pretty easily without any technical jargon or reference to science fiction concepts.)
I have no doubt of this. It’s not difficult to convince average people that a given technological innovation is dangerous. Whether doing so would cause more good than harm is a different question.
I have no doubt of this. It’s not difficult to convince average people that a given technological innovation is dangerous. Whether doing so would cause more good than harm is a different question.