Interactionism would simply require an extension of physics to include the interaction between the two, which would not defy physics any more than adding the strong nuclear force did.
It would be a problem if all the existing forces fully explain everything,IE closure.
. A normal dualist ignores the idea because there is no reason to posit it.
If you do have closure , and you don’t have overdetermination, then you get eiphenomenalism whether you want it or not.
Causal closure seems unrelated to the actuality of physics
I partly agree. I don’t see how closure can be proven without proving determinism.
It would be a problem if all the existing forces fully explain everything,IE closure.
If you do have closure , and you don’t have overdetermination, then you get eiphenomenalism whether you want it or not.
I partly agree. I don’t see how closure can be proven without proving determinism.