FWIW its fairly obvious to me that these final two technologies have significant downsides, and so calling them obviously beneficial feels like a stretch.
Do you have an actual choice to ban either technology if you want to remain sovereign? Wealthy countries without their own nuclear weapons are generally shielded by the arsenals of ones that do. If you are not using at least gpt 3.5 welcome to the unemployment line in a foreseeable timespan.
Absolutely. I will go with a counterfactual and assume we don’t mean literally 3.5 but a model using the same architecture, level of compute, and scale but has been cleaned up and fine tuned for productive tasks.
FWIW its fairly obvious to me that these final two technologies have significant downsides, and so calling them obviously beneficial feels like a stretch.
Do you have an actual choice to ban either technology if you want to remain sovereign? Wealthy countries without their own nuclear weapons are generally shielded by the arsenals of ones that do. If you are not using at least gpt 3.5 welcome to the unemployment line in a foreseeable timespan.
Ditto for countries that use and expand on got 3.5
Absolutely. I will go with a counterfactual and assume we don’t mean literally 3.5 but a model using the same architecture, level of compute, and scale but has been cleaned up and fine tuned for productive tasks.