Hey Martin Thanks for your input, it was not my intention to be misleading.
When you say “the article is about Superposition only” are you referring to my post or the original article by Anthropic? Since they named their article “Toy Models of Superposition” and my post is heavily based on the findings in that paper, I choose the title to serve as a pointer towards that reference. Especially because I could’ve used a visual pen and paper breakdown when I originally read that very article.
Feel free to read my explainer and suggest a better title :)
I mean your article, Anthropic’s work seems more like a paper.
Maybe without the “: S” it would make more sense as the reference and not a title: subtitle notion.
Hey Martin
Thanks for your input, it was not my intention to be misleading.
When you say “the article is about Superposition only” are you referring to my post or the original article by Anthropic? Since they named their article “Toy Models of Superposition” and my post is heavily based on the findings in that paper, I choose the title to serve as a pointer towards that reference. Especially because I could’ve used a visual pen and paper breakdown when I originally read that very article.
Feel free to read my explainer and suggest a better title :)
I mean your article, Anthropic’s work seems more like a paper. Maybe without the “: S” it would make more sense as the reference and not a title: subtitle notion.