I really like the pottery story. Not sure if it’s saying the same thing as the rest of the article, which contains some good advice, but felt long.
Fair point.
I split them up now. Not sure if I was supposed to do that, but you can just reply here about that.
When I saw the names of the articles and that you had posted twice in a row, I thought you were delibrately invoking your advice to try quantity over quality. It is rather amusing that you ended up doing this accidentally.
Heh.
Actually, I thought that the quality would be improved by splitting them, which happened to increase quantity.
Would it be okay to split the article after I submitted it?
It seems like the pottery story and the other two sections could be separated into separate posts.
I really like the pottery story. Not sure if it’s saying the same thing as the rest of the article, which contains some good advice, but felt long.
Fair point.
I split them up now. Not sure if I was supposed to do that, but you can just reply here about that.
When I saw the names of the articles and that you had posted twice in a row, I thought you were delibrately invoking your advice to try quantity over quality. It is rather amusing that you ended up doing this accidentally.
Heh.
Actually, I thought that the quality would be improved by splitting them, which happened to increase quantity.
Would it be okay to split the article after I submitted it?
It seems like the pottery story and the other two sections could be separated into separate posts.