I really like the pottery story. Not sure if it’s saying the same thing as the rest of the article, which contains some good advice, but felt long.
Fair point.
I split them up now. Not sure if I was supposed to do that, but you can just reply here about that.
When I saw the names of the articles and that you had posted twice in a row, I thought you were delibrately invoking your advice to try quantity over quality. It is rather amusing that you ended up doing this accidentally.
Heh.
Actually, I thought that the quality would be improved by splitting them, which happened to increase quantity.
Would it be okay to split the article after I submitted it?
It seems like the pottery story and the other two sections could be separated into separate posts.
Current theme: default
Less Wrong (text)
Less Wrong (link)
Arrow keys: Next/previous image
Escape or click: Hide zoomed image
Space bar: Reset image size & position
Scroll to zoom in/out
(When zoomed in, drag to pan; double-click to close)
Keys shown in yellow (e.g., ]) are accesskeys, and require a browser-specific modifier key (or keys).
]
Keys shown in grey (e.g., ?) do not require any modifier keys.
?
Esc
h
f
a
m
v
c
r
q
t
u
o
,
.
/
s
n
e
;
Enter
[
\
k
i
l
=
-
0
′
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
→
↓
←
↑
Space
x
z
`
g
I really like the pottery story. Not sure if it’s saying the same thing as the rest of the article, which contains some good advice, but felt long.
Fair point.
I split them up now. Not sure if I was supposed to do that, but you can just reply here about that.
When I saw the names of the articles and that you had posted twice in a row, I thought you were delibrately invoking your advice to try quantity over quality. It is rather amusing that you ended up doing this accidentally.
Heh.
Actually, I thought that the quality would be improved by splitting them, which happened to increase quantity.
Would it be okay to split the article after I submitted it?
It seems like the pottery story and the other two sections could be separated into separate posts.