It has the same kind of weirdness as the bomb tester going on.
The weirdness culminates on the event only happening if an annihilation happens. Yet in the “outcome” that the rare event happens there is nowhere an annhilation to be found.
In the crazzy-hat POV this is evidence of an event happening in a “parralel” timeline. They are not exactly parralel as they are not causally isolated as information signals can jump the gap. You now know that there is a photon in the sister timeline.
I am starting to read passages like
If we assume the particles are independent (described by local hidden variables), we conclude that they can never
as “under any single-timeline theory this does not happen”.
I am a bit of a loss where I could check what local means in that context and whether unintuitive circumventions exist. In the spatial sense it might be that while particles need to be spatially on top of each other they can take different paths to get there. Therefore if you take only one particle or its timeline to be real there are no causations happening throught that that can account for what is happening. And this can not be amended by “being really accurate” of what the “true” timeline is (on small scales, on long scales you implicitly take the formation of the false realities into account (but that goes into global rather than local territority)).
A blockage or disturbance happening in the false reality leaves very little clue that it is happening. So the first real hint is whether the spatial overlap goes one way or the other which can happen way later in time than the blockage. So if you are only allowed to condition what is the (temporally local) real state and are not allowed to condition on the false reality, prediction accuracy neccesarily suffers.
Reading up on Hardy’s Paradox
It has the same kind of weirdness as the bomb tester going on.
The weirdness culminates on the event only happening if an annihilation happens. Yet in the “outcome” that the rare event happens there is nowhere an annhilation to be found.
In the crazzy-hat POV this is evidence of an event happening in a “parralel” timeline. They are not exactly parralel as they are not causally isolated as information signals can jump the gap. You now know that there is a photon in the sister timeline.
I am starting to read passages like
as “under any single-timeline theory this does not happen”.
I am a bit of a loss where I could check what local means in that context and whether unintuitive circumventions exist. In the spatial sense it might be that while particles need to be spatially on top of each other they can take different paths to get there. Therefore if you take only one particle or its timeline to be real there are no causations happening throught that that can account for what is happening. And this can not be amended by “being really accurate” of what the “true” timeline is (on small scales, on long scales you implicitly take the formation of the false realities into account (but that goes into global rather than local territority)).
A blockage or disturbance happening in the false reality leaves very little clue that it is happening. So the first real hint is whether the spatial overlap goes one way or the other which can happen way later in time than the blockage. So if you are only allowed to condition what is the (temporally local) real state and are not allowed to condition on the false reality, prediction accuracy neccesarily suffers.