Like ricraz I was initially expecting a different post but like was was done.
However we still have the underlying problem that the replication test performed does not seem to do what it claims. https://www.sciencenews.org/blog/context/debates-whether-science-broken-dont-fit-tweets has some interesting comments I think. If I understood correctly the conclusion that a later test produced a different p-value says nothing about the underlying hypothesis—in other words the hypothesis is not tested, only the data. So unless this is all about running the same data sets....but that suggest other problems.
Like ricraz I was initially expecting a different post but like was was done.
However we still have the underlying problem that the replication test performed does not seem to do what it claims. https://www.sciencenews.org/blog/context/debates-whether-science-broken-dont-fit-tweets has some interesting comments I think. If I understood correctly the conclusion that a later test produced a different p-value says nothing about the underlying hypothesis—in other words the hypothesis is not tested, only the data. So unless this is all about running the same data sets....but that suggest other problems.